
Canaryboy
Well-Known Member
Since Hodgson got the job fans and the media have pretty much written England off in two major tournaments before they have even started, and implied that they are tournaments used to build the England team of the future. I think this is ridiculous. You spend a long time qualifying for a tournament, and often big nations fail to do that (Holland and Portugal more than once). Using a tournament to help build a future squad, isn't that what the Under 21's is for? Don't you spend two years building the squad which you then take to a tournament, rather than two years qualifying and then using the tournament as a platform for new players?
In my opinion he got the squad selection wrong, he got the tactics wrong, and just failed big time at the world cup - very little positive came out of it, we've seen Gerrard retire from international football when he could have done a job for the next couple of years. He has been inconsistent in his policies - stating that he won't have a player back once retired, but proceeding to pick Ben Foster.
I just think that he's a terrible manager for the national team, if he wants to pick kids before they are ready and leave quality experienced pros like Cole and Terry at home, then why isn't he managing the Under 21's? He seems to escaped criticism, which I find incredible considering the stick that other failed managers have come into (Wally with the brolly, turnip head). Not advocating that the media start hounding on him, but how have we gone from massively over rating our national team and thinking we can win these major tournaments, to expecting us to fail and then not complaining when we do?
Why is he getting a third crack at a tournament?
Gareth Barry had an excellent season at Everton, and I've never understood why Crouch was written off as an England player, reached double figures again for Stoke and scored 22 in 42 for England until stopped getting picked in 2010.
If the justification for leaving Cole, Barry, Terry, and possibly even Crouch, at home was that they aren't 'the future' and probably won't manage another international tournament, then that's just lame isn't it? What did Chris Smalling do last season to justify inclusion in a World Cup squad? Much less than people like Gareth Barry and John Terry?
In my opinion he got the squad selection wrong, he got the tactics wrong, and just failed big time at the world cup - very little positive came out of it, we've seen Gerrard retire from international football when he could have done a job for the next couple of years. He has been inconsistent in his policies - stating that he won't have a player back once retired, but proceeding to pick Ben Foster.
I just think that he's a terrible manager for the national team, if he wants to pick kids before they are ready and leave quality experienced pros like Cole and Terry at home, then why isn't he managing the Under 21's? He seems to escaped criticism, which I find incredible considering the stick that other failed managers have come into (Wally with the brolly, turnip head). Not advocating that the media start hounding on him, but how have we gone from massively over rating our national team and thinking we can win these major tournaments, to expecting us to fail and then not complaining when we do?
Why is he getting a third crack at a tournament?
Gareth Barry had an excellent season at Everton, and I've never understood why Crouch was written off as an England player, reached double figures again for Stoke and scored 22 in 42 for England until stopped getting picked in 2010.
If the justification for leaving Cole, Barry, Terry, and possibly even Crouch, at home was that they aren't 'the future' and probably won't manage another international tournament, then that's just lame isn't it? What did Chris Smalling do last season to justify inclusion in a World Cup squad? Much less than people like Gareth Barry and John Terry?
Last edited by a moderator: