K
Killiecanary
New Member
Heard it described as 'schoolboy' defending....certainly reminded me of playground 'first to 5' games
I also feel a bit sorry for him because he has been a crucial part of this clubs progression and was genuinely good enough as a right back back in the day, but that day has gone and whilst he is being scapegoated to a degree I'm afraid the fans are just spot on with this one.I felt bad for him because his limited ability isn't really his fault, if he's not good enough then he shouldn't be selected, but nevertheless he is a really nice guy and a great pro who has done a lot of good over the course of his career here. But surely this is the nail in his coffin? The fact is he isn't good enough and he shouldn't be playing, and choosing him ahead of Bennett today was completely the wrong call from Alex Neil. It would amaze me if Klose doesn't replace him in the side against Tottenham.
I agree there's not a lot more Rudd could've done, and the defenders don't give him any protection and as a result he conceded 5 today. However that's often the difference between goalkeepers, how often they make saves you don't expect them to make. Whilst Rudd has made a number of good saves since he's been in the team I can't remember an 'exceptional' save that he's made. Whereas Ruddy, when at his best was capable of making them.@Din
re 4 -I really don't see what Rudd could have done. That defence gives him no protection at all, and he really didn't have any chance with anything today. And when our CB plays the best through ball of the day to let Henderson 1-1 in goal, not sure what any keeper could have done. I get that the shots to goals ratio is too high, but that isn't because he isn't stopping them but more because we are giving teams gift-wrapped chances that they really can't miss.
I was referring to his play time. If he does leave I imagine it'll be at the end of next season if we're still in the Premier League. With Bassong though clearly Neil's first choice centre back (think I'm right in saying he's started every league game so far) and Klose now bought in presumably to play alongside him, it would surprise me if Martin got another chance. I'd keep him as back-up as clearly he's a big character in the dressing room and is decent enough back-up, but unfortunately I think while we're in the Premier League he should be nowhere near the starting line-up.I also feel a bit sorry for him because he has been a crucial part of this clubs progression and was genuinely good enough as a right back back in the day, but that day has gone and whilst he is being scapegoated to a degree I'm afraid the fans are just spot on with this one.
What coffin are we talking about though, his time on the pitch or his time at the club? Because we handed him a 3 year deal at the end of last season, and that one is on Alex Neil surely as he'd presumably get to give the yay or nay. Are we going to be able to find a buyer willing to take over his wages?
I'm not sure what we were doing handing a 3 year deal to a player who had decided at some stage down the road he wasn't a right back, and had yet to prove himself capable as a centre back in the Premier League, because for me the day that he decided to turn into a centre back was the day I thought we'd be leaving him behind, There is actually a post from me on this forum somewhere from early last season in which I say just that, that as a centre back he's destined for a career in the Championship or lower, and yet we handed him a 3 year contract in April whilst in a promotion battle.
Where is the room for him? I just don't understand why he got that contract. When Whittaker is released and Wisdom goes home I guess he is our backup right back, but he's said himself that he considers himself a centre back now, so its all a bit of a shambles isn't it, as he's likely on a wage that teams in the Championship won't be prepared to take on and as a bloke in his 30's with a family he's hardly going to write off a huge amount of money.
The only way that this is the last we see of Martin is if we are going to pay him not to play for the next two and a half years!
Would it?it would surprise me if Martin got another chance.
Nice of you to say but there's nothing unlucky about letting 5 goals in at home.Unlucky today folks, I was bouncing off the friggin' walls when Naisy scored, I knew he would. I was delerious when Wes put the penalty in, shame you couldn't hold out but, as an Evertonian, I Should be used to seeing leads slipping out of a teams grasp. Ah well, take heart from an otherwise great performance from yourselves.
Newcastle was different though as Martin was one of many poor performers. Plus Klose and Pinto have been bought in signifying that Neil probably knows Martin isn't good enough. As Klose couldn't play today though Neil had to choose between Martin and Bennett, and he got that choice badly wrong.Would it?
Look at the Newcastle game. He was woeful in that but AN took the easy option of putting him to right back for the next game - where he was, again, woeful. He was then put into the centre of the back 3. And only lost his place because he got suspended, there's never been any suggestions AN will drop Martin due to poor performance.
And today he could have played Klose but he didn't. He came out with some nonsense about Martin being suited to dealing with Firmino (lol) and obviously the suggestion that Klose isn't ready - which is a load of rubbish when you consider we let in 5 today and 3 in each of the last 3 games.
Martin was one of many poor performers at Bournemouth last week.Newcastle was different though as Martin was one of many poor performers.
Klose couldn't play today
You are quite right Mark it was not all bad, in fact some of it was very good. But the bad more than offset it.Din, sums it up brilliantly, was not all bad today!
I didnt catch the game so its difficult for me to comment, but looking at the bench, subs made and goal times, your only really talking about bringing on mulumbu, who hasnt exactly looked up to speed when I've seen him play. Given the headless chickens the centre midfield and entire defence became (going by the highlights ive seen),I dont see what else could have been done. I also think you are overly harsh on Rudd.AN didn't react quick enough (or at all). Granted Liverpool's 2nd went in far too soon after our 3rd but it was obvious we needed to tighten up/shore up and he didn't get it done.