Not at all! He was brilliant last season, I was referring to using him as a late impact sub.
Last season he was 7 goals and 10 assists in 30 matches. Maddison's not even managed that many assists in 10 more games and people think he's worth £25m!
Season before in the prem he had a great season too, 4 goals and 8 assists at the top level is a very good return, especially in only 25 apps.
I just don't think he's at the level now where you can play him anywhere you like (for example, left wing) for 10 minutes, and hope he changes the game. We also need to see a lot of the ball for him to be effective, so bringing him on when we were struggling for possession made little sense.
So "He hint gettin a propper chance buh" is what you're saying?
Haha, I'll take Maddisons 14 goals and 8 assists any day, it isn't his fault our strikers don't know where the net is. Do you really want to get into a "who is better right now, Maddison or Hoolahan" debate? I think a lot of his stats, certainly from last season could be seen as misleading, as it has been the case for a while now that he is selectively used in what could be seen as easier fixtures that we were expected to win.
I have never had an issue with Hoolahan, there is no denying that he has been a fantastic player for us, but I do have issue with people who are blinded by a fancy flick in a non threatening area of the field, and refuse to accept his limitations, and when he has a bad game, blame everyone else, too many people set him on a pedestal and put him beyond criticism. My main irks, even when he was playing well, was that he, too often, slowed the game down, and was too easily marked out of a game against better teams, then when he had one of his anonymous games, it was barely mentioned by anyone. And I still haven't forgotten his tantrum and comments when he wanted to join Villa.
Oh and daft old bats who call him "Our Wessie", that makes me want to dry heave.