Keep Hooper or keep RVW, straight choice...

[Canaryboy]

If we had the straight choice of keeping Hooper, or keeping RVW, with the other leaving either on a permanent transfer or season long loan, which one would you keep and name in the 25? 

 

[Canaryboy]

(Wanted to see what the poll feature looks like on the new software)

 

[Din]

To be perfectly honest it amazes me that anyone would rather we kept Van Wolfswinkel than Hooper.

 

[KeiranShikari]

People like his fancy Dutch name and pretty boy good looks.

 

[Matt Gascoine]

I still think there is a good player in there his movement is really good and i think if he was presented with half the chances Grabben has missed he would score and his confidence would soar. If i'm honest i would rather get rid of Grabben than either of the other two

 

[ZLF]

Neither?

Rvws movement, work rate and team play is streets ahead yet his confidence has gone and he won't get fans support

Hooper can finish but makes fer look like a grafter with interest when the ball is close to him,  limited team effort and no defensive contribution 

All of our squad of strikers have to be able to start.  Neither of these has had the confidence of their manager for that since they joined. 

I wouldn't choose to have either,  but I would choose to not have hooper 

 

[Indy_Bones]

I'm pretty much with ZLF on this, although I don't feel as strongly towards getting rid of Hooper.

If we could have the RvW back from his initial opening day against Everton, a player who was brimming with confidence and looking to prove his quality in this league, then I think more fans would be receptive to giving him a second chance, but until that confidence issue is sorted, he's always going to be little more than a 3rd/4th choice, but I'd rather have a willing and committed team player, than someone who seems rarely interested and has a work rate that sometimes makes Berbatov look energetic...

 

[Dubai Mark]

I was a pro RVW poster on the "other side" for a long time. But, now I am totally convinced tgat he gas to go. So, Hooper for me!

 

[The Great Mass Debater]

Hooper for me. At least we've seen what he can do, rather than what we hope he can do

 

[The Great Mass Debater]

People like his fancy Dutch name and pretty boy good looks.

Stop making me feel uncomfortable!

 

[The Great Mass Debater]

I'm pretty much with ZLF on this, although I don't feel as strongly towards getting rid of Hooper.

If we could have the RvW back from his initial opening day against Everton, a player who was brimming with confidence and looking to prove his quality in this league, then I think more fans would be receptive to giving him a second chance, but until that confidence issue is sorted, he's always going to be little more than a 3rd/4th choice, but I'd rather have a willing and committed team player, than someone who seems rarely interested and has a work rate that sometimes makes Berbatov look energetic...

RvW needs to come on as a sub and grab a goal noone expects him to get. If he had something to build on maybe he could improve. Makes you wonder about that penalty at Hull...