The lineup against Leeds actually worked, in the first half at least, I think it was a bit misrepresented that Rashica was playing as a left wingback, as it actually seemed to be big Andy that was looking after Raphinha. It was still, essentially, three at the back.
But you can spin things like that any way you like, if he changes things he is wrong, if he leaves it the same, he is wrong. Maybe if we win on Saturday it will just be luck...
You're right in that Andy was left back.
I thought he di incredibly well considering, but why put him in that position?
Hardly fair to have him, as an inexperienced centre back when there's a recognised left back on the bench (plus Williams),trying to contain Leeds best player and biggest threat.
Hanley coming across to double up on the left which left space in the middle?
McLean as left midfielder who couldn't defend to save his life? On just one occasion I saw Kenny put in a tackle in the left back position.
It was just a wrong call by Farke and the Brazilian was at the centre of most of few things which Leeds did well.
Rashica is a right footed player on the left of midfield, that's the Hughton school of wrecking the game with inverted wingers.
Don't get me started on flogging the dead horse that is Pukki and continuing to persist with the very blunt tool that is Sargent.
Don't ask me why Farke hasn't said to Kabak weeks ago not to wander off up the field with the ball.
Change isn't necessarily wrong, but the lineup and tactics on Sunday seemed to lack any clear logic.
I will read with interest any logical explanation of Farke's lineup and tactics from Sunday that you care to give us.