The Great Mass Debater
New Member
7-1. A result that will live in infamy. Arguably the lowest point in Norwich City's recent history. The remnants of Roeder's loan policy had been flushed out. 5 seasons of continual decline had resulted in the inevitible, but here beckoned a fresh start. New players, weaker opposition, new grounds to visit and hopefully a victorious campaign and a return to winning ways and restoration of pride.
All smashed to smithereens in 90 minutes.
So what went wrong? A day of high emotion as we feared what this one result predicted about our long-term future, which in the end we now know was unimportant (other than being the catalyst to bringing in Lambert and providing the leverage to remove Gunn rather harshly after one league game) and can now critique objectively.
Its oversimplistic to just lay the blame at Gunns feet. Gunn had a number of games in the championship where we didnt pick up many points, but didnt embarrass ourselves. What led to such a disasterous result? I didnt see the game, just kept getting reports of the goals going in, which I found unbelievable.
So was it poor pre-season preparation? Were the players simply under-prepared? Were Colchester simply very well prepared under Lambert? Was Lambert being in charge coincidence or an important factor? Did we start well and fall apart? Was it poor tactics? Poor organization. Was it because we had 11 new players who couldnt play together. Was it just a freak result? Were Gunn's players just not good enough?
Why, in your opinion did that result happen?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/eng_div_2/8186227.stm
Norwich
All smashed to smithereens in 90 minutes.
So what went wrong? A day of high emotion as we feared what this one result predicted about our long-term future, which in the end we now know was unimportant (other than being the catalyst to bringing in Lambert and providing the leverage to remove Gunn rather harshly after one league game) and can now critique objectively.
Its oversimplistic to just lay the blame at Gunns feet. Gunn had a number of games in the championship where we didnt pick up many points, but didnt embarrass ourselves. What led to such a disasterous result? I didnt see the game, just kept getting reports of the goals going in, which I found unbelievable.
So was it poor pre-season preparation? Were the players simply under-prepared? Were Colchester simply very well prepared under Lambert? Was Lambert being in charge coincidence or an important factor? Did we start well and fall apart? Was it poor tactics? Poor organization. Was it because we had 11 new players who couldnt play together. Was it just a freak result? Were Gunn's players just not good enough?
Why, in your opinion did that result happen?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/eng_div_2/8186227.stm
Norwich
- 01 Theoklitos
- 02 Otsemobor
- 03 Drury
- 05 Nelson
- 12 Doherty
- 04 Gill (Adeyemi 59)
- 07 Tudur-Jones
- 11 Whaley
- 14 Hoolahan
- 09 Holt
- 16 Martin (McDonald 58)
- 31 Alnwick,
- 15 Spillane,
- 17 Adeyemi,
- 19 Lappin,
- 10 Cureton,
- 27 McDonald,
- 32 Maric
Last edited by a moderator: