My preference is to not let the players rest against preston; yest performance does not need players being rewarded with a weekend off imo.
Ideally I would like to improve the understanding across the back 4 (which remains weak) and resolve the midfield issues; Name another team which tries to keep it tight then try to win, usually when we have fallen behind? Starting with one cm pairing and usually moving the wide midfielders inside to win the game; which either questions the ability of the other wide players or tettey and oneil or probably both. It was a short term solution that was another emperors new clothes and became the norm. It must be binned.
Crucially it marginalises Howson, he is positioned out of the game when wide, and when moving centrally struggles to have an impact in picking up the game; he touched the ball less than either tettey or oneil yest despite playing twice as long; the game passed him by - not something he was alone in but crucial in central midfield. He is far better than that and the formation is mainly behind that..
Up front I dont have much issue - CJ, Grabban and Hooper have all played well or poorly at some stage this season but overall give them chances they will score. My preference is for a 5 man mid which means starting either Grabban (who excelled in it) or CJ who has the best scoring record overall. Hooper showed last season that being the target man is not his role. But he remains an excellent option to change things from the bench
Some analysis of the flat cm formation. We have used it 6 times, 5 away, once at home for Huddersfield,; away at Sheff weds, Forest, wigan, derby and Reading. We have won 8 points from those 6 games (5 from 5 away) making 1.3pts per game. Without these games we have 29 from 18 games - or 1.6 pts. Or 17% worse using it.
It was supposed to improve us away from home - 5 games used, 5 points won. compared to 7 games with other formations and 12 points, or 1.7 points per game compared to 1; 40% worse. Add in fewer goals scored and the same goals conceded per match used can anyone explain why this innovative tactic is being persisted with? Add in poor passing (any player with a lower pass rate than his keeper should hang their head in shame at being called a footballer, it happened yesterday) it was nothing to recommend it.
Reviewing the games themselves its even worse; in all matches we improved when we changed the formation, particularly Sheff, Hudderfield,Derby. Reading we had already lost the game and at forest the more secure system lost a won game. Only against wigan did we hold out; in a match where ruddy touched the ball more than all players bar oneil and whittaker. A hard earned gritty on the back foot win against a poor team that was completely out of form - creating a false thought of improved performance.
We need the management team to discover their best team, one that can defend, controls midfield by protecting the back 4 AND providing an attacking threat and chances to the forwards. With precious few options to experiment in league matches and the training ground being ineffective we should look a cup run to hone that.