Wiz
New Member
Down to the Phelan factor....Adams.........or both?
Heck if I know, I'm just enjoying it atm.
Heck if I know, I'm just enjoying it atm.
Partially agree, but I think Adams' attacking ethos has been massively important in rebuilding the confidence to be creative and to be a serious offensive threat. The big failing of the Hughton era was that there was so much emphasis on being difficult to beat that we got gradually easier to beat as teams realised they could go for us with impunity in the knowledge we were devoid of any attacking creativity. We appear to be settling down defensively and you're right that the odds are that Phelan has been involved in that, but I think that's a valuable complement to what Adams has to offer rather than overriding it in importance.Of course Phelan must have had a massive input. NA wanted to play football the Norwich way. We all wanted to. But unfortunately, we don't have good enough defenders to play the old Norwich way. And I don't just mean the back four. Phelan assisted at a club that could not have won all the trophies they did without knowing how to defend first and attack from a solid defence.
And it appears to me that NA has taken advice from Phelan and put out a side that wants a clean sheet first and foremost and will set the team up to do that and rely on that style to get the win, and it doesn't matter if it is 1-0 with a last minute goal. If you don't concede then you will draw at the very least. And that isn't negative, it is just playing for 90 minutes with up to 14 men.
We will look dodgy at times but so will everyone else. We have goal scorers who hopefully will get a confidence boost knowing if they do miss, it won't be the end of the world because we are bound to concede at the other end. Looking at the table, the top seven have big goal differences and the rest are nowhere. So we know that we can beat the top sides, the results say so but have fallen prey to the bottom clubs such as Reading and Brighton, But better defending and we will put those teams to the sword,
And I do believe we will dabble in the market for a defender in January.
I agree about NA and that was why I was so surprised when he brought in as many CB's as he did strikers. I don't know Robson's credentials and ethos and whether he was no help to NA. And sometimes that is all someone needs, just some advice and I guess we can assume we dipped out when Royle left, although Everton haven't improved much this season.Partially agree, but I think Adams' attacking ethos has been massively important in rebuilding the confidence to be creative and to be a serious offensive threat. The big failing of the Hughton era was that there was so much emphasis on being difficult to beat that we got gradually easier to beat as teams realised they could go for us with impunity in the knowledge we were devoid of any attacking creativity. We appear to be settling down defensively and you're right that the odds are that Phelan has been involved in that, but I think that's a valuable complement to what Adams has to offer rather than overriding it in importance.
Completely agree Morty. Never understand when fans have it in for a certain manager and want them to fail.And expanding on the point, regardless of whether you wanted Adams, or question whether or not he is up to the job, the very best outcome from it all is that he is successful. Changing managers comes with no guarantees.
Free to join, free to read. Introduce yourself, pick a player thread, and get stuck into the next match thread.