Hull and Burnley stuck by Steve Bruce and Sean Dyche and are currently first and second in the Championship. I rest my case.
And that's a good case to make, but I still feel it is dependent on the players believing in and sticking by Alex Neil.
Because we could have made the exact same argument for not sacking Chris Hughton, but the fans didn't have an appetite for keeping him and there were allegedly first team players urging the board to sack him. He's 4th in the Championship without the benefit of any parachute payments, so its as much an argument for justifying why we should have kept Hughton here for the final year of his contract.
Hull had terrible luck with injuries in their relegation season, starting on day 1 with Snodgrass and continuing pretty much throughout the season, at one stage they were using their 3rd choice keeper with their 6th choice keeper on the bench and were not eligble for an emergency loan.
Burnley intentionally spent very little money, they effectively decided to put the bank ahead of survival and do a yo-yo. They didn't make a single high profile or big money signing (George Boyd £3m their record signing).
There are no such mitigating circumstances around our dreadful run of form, we've invested heavily in players and haven't had any major injury problems.