Transfer gossip.

morty

morty

Moderator
Staff member
Indeed, I think this "dodgy knee" thing has been maybe overplayed a bit.
 
ZLF

ZLF

Well-Known Member
austins wages and he stated desire to stay south meant he was never a target we were going to succeed in even getting to colney;  his knee is a red herring - he was nearly as unattainable as messi to us.

saints?  already have higher wages, are south based so fits CA demands,  and as a clubhave better alternatives in pelle and long (even if the latter is a liverpool target) as such their dependency on his knees is lower;   playing mainly as a sub suits any injury.   End of contract price means its sensible business for one of the few clubs he would go to (surprised palace didnt show an interest tho)
 
G

gerryinromania

Well-Known Member
If he is on 80k a week, which is a reasonable guess, that makes the whole 4 and a half year deal worth nearly 23 million.
Makes you blink a bit
 
K

Killiecanary

New Member
Wouldn't it just!?  

Pinto, Klose and Naismith for a combined 20 mil would represent a real statement of intent wouldn't it!

Absolutely the right t three positions to target too...in an ideal world I might like a lead the line striker to complement these, but after yesterday this would be very welcome news indeed
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: ZLF
ZLF

ZLF

Well-Known Member
A mobile striker is needed but not sure we have anyone in mind beyond haller rejecting us.
 
morty

morty

Moderator
Staff member
If this is even close to being accurate David McNally deserves a round of applause.

 
  • Like
Reactions: ZLF
N

Number 9

Well-Known Member
Hoops hasn't gone yet, but what a window.

Factor in also the loan fees for all those players out & about, and those fringe players who might still go for loan or sale; 

Laffers

Whits

Andreu

Loza

Dorrans

I'd like to see a proper striker either buy or loan, we are going in the right direction.

(No guarantee that the new players will be successful, but they look the part)
 
L

Lavanche

New Member
Well you have to add Brady, Dorrans buy option, Jarvis buy option and if we have already agreed Mbokani's buy option after season if Johnson is added on other side.

Also if you check our current age structure it doesn't look healthy. Naismith 30 and Klose 28 this year.  We have only Redmond and Brady under 25 from players that get game time and only 3 players under 27 this year which is considered the age after decline starts in physical attributes and recovery.

This season we have 10 players 30 or over and Naismith is 11th. Only Whittaker and Ruddy are players that we dont at the moment rely on.

So I wouldn't applaud yet before  we even see if these 3 can do the job. This just means that we cant turn many of our players to money if we relegate and we have to in few seasons replace almost whole starting 11 without possibility of healthy competition or players developing behind.

In champioship we probably can cope by youth developement, but in premiership our age structure starts to look roster of a dying team just like what happened with Fulham. In next summer if we survive we should only look in age group 20-25 if we want any continuity.

EDIT: And sorry for being this negative all the time. I just fear we will face problems because our transfer policy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
morty

morty

Moderator
Staff member
I don't think we will buy Mbokani at the end of the season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZLF
L

Lavanche

New Member
I don't think we will buy Mbokani at the end of the season.
We shouldnt, but you never know what kind of deal we made. There are for example deals where we pay penalty if we dont use buy clause and that can be almost same ammount as buy clause.
 
KeiranShikari

KeiranShikari

New Member
Don't think the 30 mark is that much of a big deal really. Would be a bit worried if the core of the squad was 33 plus but in today's age of red zones and sports science we'll be fine. 
 
morty

morty

Moderator
Staff member
We shouldnt, but you never know what kind of deal we made. There are for example deals where we pay penalty if we dont use buy clause and that can be almost same ammount as buy clause.
If he was two or three years younger I'd be more interested. I have heard he is on 80k a week at his club, I really don't think we would be prepared to make that leap in wages.

I see him as a stop gap until we can buy a similar striker, and if we stay up then we should be able to.
 
Indy_Bones

Indy_Bones

New Member
80k a week!

I wouldn't pay him 8k a week on what I've seen since he arrived FFS!
 

Sit with the City fans who turn up

Free to join, free to read. Introduce yourself, pick a player thread, and get stuck into the next match thread.

Create a free account
Top