By using Norwichtalk.com services you agree to our Cookies Use and Data Transfer outside the EU.
We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, ads and Newsletters.

Transfer rumours.

Status
Not open for further replies.
morty

morty

Moderator
Staff member
Not sure about this, can cover at RB but is primarily a LB, and not sure he'd get in ahead of either fullback.
 
N

Number 9

Well-Known Member
Not sure about this, can cover at RB but is primarily a LB, and not sure he'd get in ahead of either fullback.
Cover for Sicknote Sam I should think.
Plus, maybe Max is going?

Giannalouis? Max, Byram, Bali are the recognised full backs, obviously Byram is a gamble.
Farke has played Sorensen and Placheta at full back too.
 
morty

morty

Moderator
Staff member
Yeah I think it definitely says something about how much we are expecting to see of Byram any time soon...
 
Fenway Frank

Fenway Frank

Well-Known Member
Nah, wouldn't have thought so. Do we still have Sam Mcallum on loan at Coventry, or did we sell him?
McAllum is at QPR but hasn’t made a match day squad yet but I don’t know whether he has an injury or not.
 
OldRobert

OldRobert

Well-Known Member
Don't know why we still have Byram, or Mcallum come to that. Neither of them will make the starting eleven, Byram will never stay fit, other one ain't good enough.
 
N

Number 9

Well-Known Member
Don't know why we still have Byram, or Mcallum come to that. Neither of them will make the starting eleven, Byram will never stay fit, other one ain't good enough.
We still have them because they're on contract.
Who would buy Byram off us?

Mcallum is one of several youngsters who should they not prove good enough for the first team, make money for the club through loan fees etc.
Chelsea used to be criticised for buying up gifted young players on a huge scale, they where all farmed out on loan making money for the club, a handful of the best might eventually see some first team action.
We're doing exactly the same thing, Neil Adams is running it.
 
morty

morty

Moderator
Staff member
We still have them because they're on contract.
Who would buy Byram off us?

Mcallum is one of several youngsters who should they not prove good enough for the first team, make money for the club through loan fees etc.
Chelsea used to be criticised for buying up gifted young players on a huge scale, they where all farmed out on loan making money for the club, a handful of the best might eventually see some first team action.
We're doing exactly the same thing, Neil Adams is running it.
That is exactly what we are doing, we are a football production line, it is how we survive. And I would wager we are actually doing it pretty well, too!
 
T

theovnst

New Member
Do y know everything about the fleet between Marseille (France) and Norwich? Some person talk its a Marseille player
 
N

Number 9

Well-Known Member
How is Byram making money for the club? McAllum ok take your point.
Sorry, I thought that I'd differentiated between the two.

Byram is a player we should never have bought, an appalling injury record and the odd occasion he played, he wasn't exactly special.

The multitudinous young players we have purchased, of which Mcallum is one, are not mostly not good enough for our first team so are farmed out around the leagues for loan fees.
 
OldRobert

OldRobert

Well-Known Member
Just to wind Morty up................only signed because Byram is permanently injured, Greek one got a bollocking after Saturday, now deemed not good enough by DF hence the signing, Max will now probably leave and Mumba will go out on loan..............hows that?! :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top