what bothers me more is enforced diversity when it is touted that we must have more black managers. Why should we? If they are good enough then it doesn't matter what colour they are, and the premise they should be given a chance just because of their colour is a bit odd, in my opinion.
That debate annoys me a little bit too, it would require a huge academic study to actually determine whether black managers are disadvantaged rather than just counting how many there are out of 92 at any given time. For example, what percentage of black players actually take their coaching badges, what percentage of job applications are from black managers, etc.
And the most relevant statistic is surely what proportion of black players with serious managerial aspirations are handed their first job in management, rather than how many stay in the job, because it doesn't matter what colour your skin is... most managers fail and don't get past their first job.
I suspect that there is actually a little bit of truth in the claim that black managers don't get the same number of first opportunities that white ones do, but ultimately it comes down to how many are good enough to stay on the conveyor belt, once you get a chance if you are good enough you'll stay in the profession.
Sol Campbell didn't do black managers many favours when we last had this debate, crying foul over racism because Gary Neville got a cushy job with England instead of him. I wonder whether Campbell would be prepared to go and manage for a year or two at Accrington Stanley for £800 a week for experience and to prove himself, or whether he would he sneer his nose up at £40k to £50k a year because he can make man times that amount just moving his money from investment A to investment B and back again.