Will Van Wolfswinkel Be A Success With St Etienne?

Will RVW be a hit in France ?

  • Yes, Sack adams !!

    Votes: 1 3.2%
  • Yes, Really silly getting rid of him.

    Votes: 13 41.9%
  • Maybe, maybe not

    Votes: 7 22.6%
  • No, Not worth the money.

    Votes: 4 12.9%
  • No, Didnt want him in the first place.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes, Best for club and him

    Votes: 6 19.4%

  • Total voters
    31
B

bloodwagon

Member
Thats what gets me, RVW didnt even get a chance to prove himself.
 
Canaryboy

Canaryboy

Well-Known Member
If i had a choice between them, i would go with Hooper
That was my thinking until I heard numerous reports that he looked out of shape in pre-season, now I'm not so sure. I hope it was just the new shirt design making him look stocky - I don't think he managed to put the ball in the net either did he? 
 
skijumptoes

skijumptoes

Active Member
CanaryBoy - i wouldn't worry about that, good strikers are a breed unto themselves.. The whole time Holt was doing the biz for us the reports from training would be that he wouldn't even make the team based on his performances.

Hoops is a stocky lad, and that's going to serve him well this season, what he is carrying will naturally drop off/turn to muscle.  But he's never been less than stocky in the time i've seen him play.
 
B

bloodwagon

Member
Come on people, i know theres more than 16 people on this forum.

What do you think about RVW, heres your chance to say without getting it in the neck (unlike other forums).
 
skijumptoes

skijumptoes

Active Member
Bloodwagon, looking at reactions on twitter and other forums, i think there's many people who agree with the move, that it's best for the player and club, and think that he will do well.

The option to vote that just doesn't exist! You needed this option really:

Yes - Best move for club and player
 
BarclayBoy88

BarclayBoy88

New Member
Bloodwagon, looking at reactions on twitter and other forums, i think there's many people who agree with the move, that it's best for the player and club, and think that he will do well.

The option to vote that just doesn't exist! You needed this option really:

Yes - Best move for club and player
Seconded, I voted for the following because it was the closest one, but wopuld have definitely voted for the Yes - Best move for club and player if it were available Yes, Really silly getting rid of him
 
skijumptoes

skijumptoes

Active Member
I muttered those very words about 7 years ago, and i have 3 children now - Go careful bloodwagon! ;)
 
B

bloodwagon

Member
Ok added the option of "best for club and him"

Think theres an option that you can change your vote.

Hope this helps people who didnt see the option they wanted. :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
skijumptoes

skijumptoes

Active Member
It needed a 'yes' in front really lol, otherwise it's not answering the question that option.

Oh man i feel like i'm giving you a hard time now!!  Sorry! :)
 
B

bloodwagon

Member
Its ok I dont mind, first poll i have done so needed peoples feedback
 
skijumptoes

skijumptoes

Active Member
Looks good mate, you've got balance now!! ...It felt like the votes were either negative to the player or club unless you sat on the fence.
 
Yellow Fever

Yellow Fever

New Member
I also like RvW and my heart wanted him to stay but my head questions whether he will ever be the right type of player for the English leagues. Like Torres, he may just be one of those who isn't suited to it. My other feeling is that in spite of his professional behaviour throughout, he really didn't want to stay and play in the championship. The deal is a good one, whatever happens.
 
B

bloodwagon

Member
Well Yellow, we might get our money back or very close to it, but i for one would have liked him to stay, just to prove the tactics last season were wrong.

Just my option.
 
lyb

lyb

Active Member
I think it was a bad decision for two reasons. I think he's fundamentally a decent player and I'm certain he could have done well this season after a nasty blip in an otherwise excellent career last year. The other element that bothers me is that I would like to hold on to Leroy Fer and, given the two of them are pretty close, it may affect things with Fer. From Ricky's point of view, sticking with it would give him another crack at the Premier League if we have a decent season, and on the squad quality we have, we really should be expecting promotion this season. Anything less will be failure.
 
skijumptoes

skijumptoes

Active Member
My other feeling is that in spite of his professional behaviour throughout, he really didn't want to stay and play in the championship.
I just can't subscribe to that thought, i'm not saying i'm right, but i could imagine a situation where he has our club deciding it's best for him to go out on loan, and his advisors (Agent?) saying the same.  Basically both parties in either ear influencing him, who let's be honest are primarily concerned with his stock becoming a saleable asset again.

I believe Ricky had the opinion that he wanted to see the job through after coming back from summer break,  and show us over here what he's capable of.  Otherwise, no matter where he plays this will remain a monkey on his back that he never attempted to undo.

For me, this ties up with Adam's comment in regards to it being up to Ricky which move he makes.  It ties up to what his agent said, and it also tie up with what Ricky's posted on twitter over pre-season.

He's basically got a club on one hand who's not willing to commit to him, and agent who's warning him that a failure at this level could be hugely threatening to his career.... And thus we have the final result.  As a fan i'm gutted, from a business viewpoint where risk elements have to be reduced where possible, i can see how it makes sense.  And i can also understand that another failed season in the championship would have a major affect on his career.

However..

I fail to believe that he feels he's too good and couldn't lower himself to play championship football, it just doesn't match up with his general persona, and if true together with his agent they would've be actively engineering a move away.  Subsequently, in that situation i couldn't see us being so obliging in bending over backwards with a loan/agree to buy deal for a club like St Etienne.  We would make it clear, if you want him, show us the money or we'll make use of him.

That's my view on it, if i mull things over.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Sit with the City fans who turn up

Free to join, free to read. Introduce yourself, pick a player thread, and get stuck into the next match thread.

Create a free account
Top